The whole point of acting is to make your audience believe you - your words, your emotions, your plight. I believed everything that came out of Alex's mouth as he accepted the mantle he'd been given. Just as compelling was Merlin - a teenager on the outside with an old man on the inside. Imrie played Merlin to a T, convincing as both old man and boy, and quirky as all get out.
Though these two shone brightest, their accompanying troupe of young actors left nothing wanting (if Lancelot and Kay were a bit on the wooden side once or twice, it was forgiven). The directing - I loved the scenery, the cinematography, and the CGI. Nothing felt fake, and the stakes remained high throughout the film. Joe Cornish presented a world I wanted to be part of. The story - King Arthur isn't just any old legend you can toss up on the screen. It's a British child's rite of passage. Everyone knows the story of King Arthurt - even in the States. Taking on a new and fresh telling had to be compelling, intriguing, action-filled, fast-paced, exciting, and daring. The Kid Who Would Be King hit all the marks. I loved being taken for a ride as Alex takes his noble character and broadens it, emboldening himself and his friends while making his enemies join his cause. I loved Alex. I rooted for him Bedivere as they strove to accomplish their task. It's a movie I will repeat watch with not a hint of guilt. The Negatives: It was over too quickly. There were some scenes that were surprisingly violent. In the UK I'm sure no one bats an eye, but in the USA, everyone spends so much time shielding their children from EVERYTHING that I think it might go too far for some parents. The Rating: 4 solid feathers. Maybe even 4.5 Final Verdict: Why are you still reading this? Go get your King on!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRanting, raving, loving every minute of it - let's talk movies. Archives
March 2021
Categories
All
|